Jun 17, 2014 at 12:48 PM - fantasticx.1991: billion not million
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:48 PM - MrHippocrit: I am talking about micro
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:48 PM - fantasticx.1991: ahh
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:48 PM - fantasticx.1991:
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM - MrHippocrit: 640000000 Petabytes in a full sec?
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM - fantasticx.1991: Well..? did you divide by 4?
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM - fantasticx.1991: or you need to multiply?
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM - fantasticx.1991: I'm
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM - MrHippocrit: so, 160 petabytes in 250 nanosec
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:50 PM - fantasticx.1991: X4 = micro
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:50 PM - MrHippocrit: 1000 nanosec = 1 microsec
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:50 PM - fantasticx.1991: x4x10^(6) = sec
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:50 PM - MrHippocrit: so 160 times 4 = 640
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:50 PM - Darkfire: 160,000,000,000 petabytes/sec
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:50 PM - fantasticx.1991: I'm out of my mind atm
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:50 PM - MrHippocrit: I feel like that doesn't work
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51 PM - Darkfire: 160,000 petabytes/microsec
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51 PM - MrHippocrit: 160 peta in 250 nano
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51 PM - Darkfire: nanosec = 1/1billion of a second
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51 PM - Darkfire: oh
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51 PM - Darkfire: wait
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51 PM - MrHippocrit: exactly
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51 PM - Darkfire: I missread that
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51 PM - fantasticx.1991: 160 petabytes of data in a mere 250 nanoseconds.
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51 PM - Darkfire: thought it was 160/nanosec
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - fantasticx.1991: That quarter....
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - Darkfire: that is abit more realistic
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - fantasticx.1991: messed everything up
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - MrHippocrit: so it would be easier to do x4x10^6
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - fantasticx.1991:
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - Darkfire: 640,000,000
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - MrHippocrit: since a 1000 nano is 1 micro
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - MrHippocrit: yeah
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - Darkfire: per second
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - MrHippocrit: wouldn't that be 640 zettabytes a sec?
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:48 PM - MrHippocrit: I am talking about micro
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:48 PM - fantasticx.1991: ahh
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:48 PM - fantasticx.1991:

Jun 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM - MrHippocrit: 640000000 Petabytes in a full sec?
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM - fantasticx.1991: Well..? did you divide by 4?
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM - fantasticx.1991: or you need to multiply?
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM - fantasticx.1991: I'm
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM - MrHippocrit: so, 160 petabytes in 250 nanosec
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:50 PM - fantasticx.1991: X4 = micro
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:50 PM - MrHippocrit: 1000 nanosec = 1 microsec
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:50 PM - fantasticx.1991: x4x10^(6) = sec
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:50 PM - MrHippocrit: so 160 times 4 = 640
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:50 PM - Darkfire: 160,000,000,000 petabytes/sec
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:50 PM - fantasticx.1991: I'm out of my mind atm
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:50 PM - MrHippocrit: I feel like that doesn't work
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51 PM - Darkfire: 160,000 petabytes/microsec
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51 PM - MrHippocrit: 160 peta in 250 nano
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51 PM - Darkfire: nanosec = 1/1billion of a second
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51 PM - Darkfire: oh
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51 PM - Darkfire: wait
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51 PM - MrHippocrit: exactly
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51 PM - Darkfire: I missread that
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51 PM - fantasticx.1991: 160 petabytes of data in a mere 250 nanoseconds.
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51 PM - Darkfire: thought it was 160/nanosec
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - fantasticx.1991: That quarter....
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - Darkfire: that is abit more realistic
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - fantasticx.1991: messed everything up
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - MrHippocrit: so it would be easier to do x4x10^6
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - fantasticx.1991:

Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - Darkfire: 640,000,000
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - MrHippocrit: since a 1000 nano is 1 micro
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - MrHippocrit: yeah
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - Darkfire: per second
Jun 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM - MrHippocrit: wouldn't that be 640 zettabytes a sec?




